PRL 2002 Community Consultation and Development

SubjectCat-NbrClassTermModeDescriptionUnitsCampus
PRL2002210611, 2003ONCCommunity Consultation and Development1.00TWMBA

Academic Group:FOART
Academic Org:FOA004
HECS Band:2
ASCED Code:080509


Contents



STAFFING:

Examiner: Alison Feldman
Moderator: Aidan Burke
Team Member: Jill Lawrence




RATIONALE:

Community consultation and development has rapidly become the principal approach by which organisations are strategically and responsively managing and coordinating their business affairs. The demand for expertise in this area is high at present and this is predicted to continue into the future with the ongoing expansion of democratisation in modern communities.



SYNOPSIS:

This course introduces students preparing to enter professional contexts to contemporary communication management strategies and techniques used in community development and consultation. Students will develop practical and conceptual skills in relation to the trends, issues and processes involved in project planning and implementation, and the building of social capital through community consultation, network facilitation and collaborative action.



OBJECTIVES:

On successful completion of this course students will be able to:

  • demonstrate an informed awareness of the broad context in which social processes, particularly community consultation, development and planning occur;

  • demonstrate an understanding of the modern developments in democracy (including organisational) in relation to their influence on community participation and consultation in government and corporate sector planning;

  • demonstrate an understanding of the core communicative skills and organisational planning competences required for executing community consultation activities;

  • demonstrate an understanding of the key procedures used in conducting community consultation and development projects;

  • evaluate a range of prominent methodoligical issues and complexities involved in conducting community consultation;

  • apply procedural writing methods used for documenting, reporting and evaluating community consultation and participation projects.




  • TOPICS:


    DescriptionWeighting (%)
    1. The historical framework of community consultation and development.
    5.00
    2. An introduction to the broad paradigmatic context surrounding contemporary social processes incorporating the theoretical approaches of chaos and complexity theory
    15.00
    3. Modern developments in democracy and the move towards practices
    15.00
    4. The core communicative skills and competences required for conducting community consultation.
    5.00
    5. A generic model of the community consultation and participation process.
    10.00
    6. Preliminary research and planning in the community consultation and participation process.
    10.00
    7. Information dissemination and awareness raising for community consultation events and activities.
    10.00
    8. Planning and conducting consultative and participative activities for community Consultation and development projects.
    10.00
    9. Information collation and analysis, and the generating of options and potential outcomes in community consultation and development.
    10.00
    10. Evaluating community consultation and development projects.
    10.00


    TEXT and MATERIALS required to be PURCHASED or accessed:

    Books can be ordered by fax or telephone. For costs and further details use the 'Book Search' facility at http://bookshop.usq.edu.au by entering the author or title of the text.

    Course PRL2002: Selected Readings

    Burke, E.M 1999, Corporate Community Relations: The Principle of the Neighbor of Choice, Praeger, Westport.





    REFERENCE MATERIALS:

    Reference materials are materials that, if accessed by students, may improve their knowledge and understanding of the material in the course and enrich their learning experience.

    Dalmau, T. & Dick, B 1991, A Diagnostic Model for Selecting Interventions for Community and Organisational Change, 2nd edition, Interchange, Brisbane.

    Emery, M 1989, Participative Design for Participative Democracy, Centre for Continuing Education, Australian National University, Canberra.

    Flood, M. & Lawrence, A 1987, The Community Action Book, 2nd edition, Council of Social Service NSW, Sydney.

    Ife, J 1995, Community Development, Creating Community Alternatives - vision, analysis and practice, Addison Wesley Longman, South Melbourne.

    Kenny, S 1999, Developing Communities for the Future: Community Development in Australia, 2nd edition, Thomas Nelson Australia, South Melbourne.

    Sarkissian, W., Pelrgut, D. eds 1994, The Community Participation Handbook: Resources for Public Involvement in the Planning Process, 2nd edition, Murdoch Institute for Science & Technology Policy, Western Australia.

    Servaes, J. Jacobson, T. & White, S. (eds) 1996, Participatory Communication for Social Change, Sage Publications, New Delhi.

    Stacey, R 1996, Complexity and Creativity in Organizations, Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco.

    White, A., Nair, K. & Ascroft, J. (eds) 1994, Participatory Communication: Working for Change and Development, Sage Publications, New Delhi.





    STUDENT WORKLOAD REQUIREMENTS:

    ACTIVITYHOURS
    Directed Study88
    Lectures13
    Private Study38
    Tutorial26



    ASSESSMENT DETAILS:

    DescriptionMarks Out ofWtg(%)RequiredDue Date
    TUTE PRESENT & PRESENTATION100.0040.00Y03 Mar 2003(see note )
    CASE STUDY REPORT100.0060.00Y11 Jun 2003(see note )
    NOTES:
    .
    Tutorial Presentation and Paper (1500-2000 words). Schedule for tutorial presentations (and and due dates) will be advised at begining of semester.
    .
    2500 - 3000 Words


    OTHER REQUIREMENTS:

    1. Submission of ALL pieces of assessment is compulsory.
    2. Assignments submitted after the due date will be penalised by 10% per working day for the first five working days late, after which a grade of zero will be awarded.
    3. Requests for assignment extensions must be made to the course examiner in writing BEFORE the due date. Extensions will not be granted on or after the due date.
    4. Assignment extensions will not be granted except on medical or compassionate grounds and only with the provision of appropriate medical or other documentation (such as a letter of referral from a qualified counsellor). Workload, or failure of computer equipment will not be considered grounds for extension.
    5. The final grade is based on the aggregate of all assessment items and is assigned as follows: HD = 90-100, A = 80-89, B = 65-79, C = 50-64, F = 0-49
    6. Tutorial attendance and participation is strongly advised. Students who fail to attend any tutorials may be required to complete make-up work.