VSA2001 Artists, Works and Processes
|Semester 2, 2013 On-campus Toowoomba|
|Faculty or Section :||Faculty of Arts|
|School or Department :||School of Creative Arts|
|Version produced :||25 April 2014|
Examiner: Kyle Jenkins
Moderator: Alexis Tacey
This course will discuss the multifaceted approaches to current contemporary practices which are occurring nationally and internationally. This will be done by focusing on both artists groups as well as individuals who are producing working methodologies which are both traditionally hybrid based. Both 20th and 21st Century cultural and artistic theory will be discussed in relationship to the artwork discussed in lectures and tutorials.
This course is concerned with building students knowledge of both historical and current debates within 20th and 21st century theory. Within this students will develop an ability to critically look at and develop understanding of key Modernist, Post-Modernist and contemporary artists who work within traditional modes of practice but also individuals who have developed a multidisciplinary practice. Each week students will be presented with a new topic which will be discussed and developed within the lecture and tutorial.
On completion of this course students will be able to:
- demonstrate the role of artistic concerns in forming the aesthetics of visual arts;
- apply a knowledge of the development of contemporary aesthetics and concepts through a broad survey of historical and current contemporary thought;
- demonstrate cultural and professional literacy through investigating underlying aesthetic conventions within works of art in their varying contexts;
- demonstrate written and oral communication skills by clearly and logically expressing ideas pertaining to aesthetic and conceptual perspectives as they relate to the visual arts in general and their own work specifically, supported by evidence of research and analysis;
- manage and coordinate the research exploration required to successfully fulfil the requirements for assignments 1, 2 and the image in-class test (assignment 3) as well as the weekly research, documentation and discussion generated for answering the tutorial questions (assignment 4). All these will reflect and address the course objectives.
|1.||The Purposes of Artworks: vehicles for visual communication||10.00|
|2.||The Portrait and Self Imagery||10.00|
|3.||The Studio/Market Place Relationship: Public Art + Alternative Sites||10.00|
|4.||Towards a Philosophy of Art: the works and processes of some key artists. Part 1: DVD||10.00|
|5.||Towards a Philosophy of Art: the works and processes of some key artists Part 2: DVD||10.00|
|6.||The Antipodean Image: Place and identity in Australian art||10.00|
|7.||The Roles of Popular Culture and the Challenge to Tradition||10.00|
|8.||Reconsidering the Object||10.00|
|9.||On the Museum's Ruins||10.00|
|10.||Image Responses: Transitional Practices||10.00|
Text and materials required to be purchased or accessed
ALL textbooks and materials available to be purchased can be sourced from USQ's Online Bookshop (unless otherwise stated). (https://bookshop.usq.edu.au/bookweb/subject.cgi?year=2013&sem=02&subject1=VSA2001)
Please contact us for alternative purchase options from USQ Bookshop. (https://bookshop.usq.edu.au/contact/)
- There are no texts or materials required for this course.
Benjamin, A & Osborne, P (eds) 1991, Thinking art: beyond traditional aesthetics, Institute of Contemporary Art, London.
Bryson, N, Holly, M A & Moxey, K (eds) 1991, Visual theory: painting and interpretation, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Collinson, D 1988, Fifty major philosophers: a reference guide, Routledge, New York, London.
Cooper, D 1996, World philosophies: an historical introduction, Blackwell, Oxford, Cambridge, MA.
Danto, A C 1986, The philosophical disenfranchisement of art, Columbia University Press, New York.
Student workload requirements
|Description||Marks out of||Wtg (%)||Due Date||Notes|
|ASSIGNMENT 1 - 2000 WD ESSAY||100||30||12 Aug 2013|
|ASSIGNMENT 2 - 2000 WD ESSAY||100||30||09 Sep 2013|
|TUTORIAL QUESTIONS||100||40||21 Oct 2013|
Important assessment information
It is the students' responsibility to attend and participate appropriately in all activities (such as lectures, tutorials, laboratories and practical work) scheduled for them, and to study all material provided to them or required to be accessed by them to maximise their chance of meeting the objectives of the course and to be informed of course-related activities and administration. Students must attend and complete the requirements of the Workplace Health and Safety training program for this course where required.
Requirements for students to complete each assessment item satisfactorily:
To satisfactorily complete an individual assessment item a student must achieve at least 50% of the marks.
Penalties for late submission of required work:
If students submit assignments after the due date without (prior) approval of the examiner then a penalty of 5% of the total marks gained by the student for the assignment may apply for each working day late up to ten working days at which time a mark of zero may be recorded.
Requirements for student to be awarded a passing grade in the course:
To be assured of receiving a passing grade a student must achieve at least 50% of the total weighted marks available for the course.
Method used to combine assessment results to attain final grade:
The final grades for students will be assigned on the basis of the aggregate of the weighted marks obtained for each of the summative assessment items in the course.
There is no examination in this course.
Examination period when Deferred/Supplementary examinations will be held:
As there are no examinations in this course, there will be no deferred or supplementary examinations.
University Student Policies:
Students should read the USQ policies: Definitions, Assessment and Student Academic Misconduct to avoid actions which might contravene University policies and practices. These policies can be found at http://policy.usq.edu.au.
The due date for an assignment is the date by which a student must despatch the assignment to the USQ. The onus is on the student to provide proof of the despatch date, if requested by the Examiner.
Students must retain a copy of each item submitted for assessment. This must be despatched to USQ within 24 hours if required by the Examiner.
In accordance with University Policy, the Examiner may grant an extension of the due date of an assignment in extenuating circumstances.
If electronic submission of assessments is specified for the course, students will be notified of this in the course Introductory Book and on the USQ Study Desk. All required electronic submission must be made through the Assignment Drop Box located on the USQ Study Desk for the course, unless directed otherwise by the examiner of the course. The due date for an electronically submitted assessment is the date by which a student must electronically submit the assignment. The assignment files must be submitted by 11.55pm on the due date using USQ time (as displayed on the clock on the course home page; that is, Australian Eastern Standard Time).
If the method of assessment submission is by written, typed or printed paper-based media students should (i) submit to the Faculty Office for students enrolled in the course in the on-campus mode, or (ii) mail to the USQ for students enrolled in the course in the external mode. The due date for the assessment is the date by which a student must (i) submit the assessment for students enrolled in the on-campus mode, or (ii) mail the assessment for students enrolled in the external mode.
The Faculty will NOT normally accept submission of assessments by facsimile or email.
Students who do not have regular access to postal services for the submission of paper-based assessments, or regular access to Internet services for electronic submission, or are otherwise disadvantaged by these regulations may be given special consideration. They should contact the examiner of the course to negotiate such special arrangements prior to the submission date.
Students who have undertaken all of the required assessments in a course but who have failed to meet some of the specified objectives of a course within the normally prescribed time may be awarded one of the temporary grades: IM (Incomplete - Make up), IS (Incomplete - Supplementary Examination) or ISM (Incomplete -Supplementary Examination and Make up). A temporary grade will only be awarded when, in the opinion of the examiner, a student will be able to achieve the remaining objectives of the course after a period of non directed personal study.
Students who, for medical, family/personal, or employment-related reasons, are unable to complete an assignment or to sit for an examination at the scheduled time may apply to defer an assessment in a course. Such a request must be accompanied by appropriate supporting documentation. One of the following temporary grades may be awarded IDS (Incomplete - Deferred Examination; IDM (Incomplete Deferred Make-up); IDB (Incomplete - Both Deferred Examination and Deferred Make-up).
Students may be assigned an "Incomplete" grade to signify that all the requirements of the course have not yet been met. Students who are graded "I" can pass the course by successfully completing such additional work as prescribed by the examiner by a given date. Students who have been awarded an IM, ISM, IDM or IDB grade must access information regarding further work to be completed, in the Student Centre of U Connect. The Grades Page in the Student Centre contains information about further work to be completed. Students who have not completed the additional work to the satisfaction of the examiner by the given date will receive the appropriate Failing grade.
Students can expect that questions in assessment items in this course may draw upon knowledge and skills that they can reasonably be expected to have acquired before enrolling in the course. This includes knowledge contained in pre-requisite courses and appropriate communication, information literacy, analytical, critical thinking, problem solving or numeracy skills. Students who do not possess such knowledge and skills should not expect to achieve the same grades as those students who do possess them.