USQConnect

USQ OpenCourseWare

ICT Student Satisfaction Survey 2008

Delivering ICT systems and services to students from different parts of the world with diverse cultures and backgrounds creates challenges for Universities. The ICT satisfaction survey was designed to gain information about student needs so that systems and services remain relevant and continue to improve in the future.  The survey was first introduced in 2005 and is run annually over a four week period during Semester 2 each year. Links to the survey are located on USQConnect, USQStudyDesk, and the Division of ICT Services web pages.

Results from the 2008 survey have been compared to the results obtained in 2005, 2006, and 2007. These results provide a benchmark for future surveys, which allows a process of continuous improvement to the Division.

The main services addressed in the Student Survey are as follows:

    1. USQAdmin
    2. USQConnect
    3. USQStudyDesk
    4. USQAssist
    5. Online Library Catalogues
    6. Dial-in Access to USQ
    7. Laptop Wireless Connections
    8. Student E-mail
    9. Electronic Discussion Groups
  10. USQ Computer Labs
  11. On-campus Printers and Scanners
  12. Student Help Desk
  13. Off-campus Printers and Scanners
  14. Support for User Name and Passwords
  15. Training

Survey Instrument

The survey instrument was divided into 4 main categories:

1. Satisfaction
The satisfaction section contained three main groups: (a) Systems, (b) Services, and (c) Support.  Students were asked to rate their satisfaction on a scale of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). 

2. Ease of Use
To reduce the dimensionality of the ease of use questions, the responses were aggregated into into 5 groups: (a) USQConnect, (b) USQAdmin, (c) USQStudyDesk, (d) USQAssist, and (e) Others.  Ease of use was analysed on a scale of 1 (Difficult) to 5 (Easy). 

3. Frequency of Use
The frequency of use questions were also aggregated into 5 groups: (a) USQConnect, (b) USQAdmin, (c) USQStudyDesk, (d) USQAssist, and (e) Others.  Students were asked to rate their frequency of use on a scale of Never through to 10+ more times per nominated period (daily, weekly, or annually).

4. Demographics
The demographics profile of respondents is provided so that comparisons can be made between 2005, 2006, and 2007 participants.