5. Pavement Design
5.1 Preamble
A variety of pavement design methods are available
for all types of pavements. This module will concentrate on the design of
flexible pavements, and two types of pavement design method will be considered:
- empirical methods (e.g. based on the California
Bearing Ratio strength test for soils), and
- theoretical methods (e.g. based on layered elastic
material theory).
5.2 Terminology
- Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) -
The total yearly traffic volume divided by 365.
- Base - The portion of the pavement which
supports the surfacing.
- Commercial Vehicle - A vehicle having
at least one axle with dual wheels and/or having more than two axles.
- Course - One or more layers of the same
material within a pavement structure.
- Deflection - The vertical elastic (recoverable)
deformation of a pavement surface.
- Design Period - The period over which
the pavement is expected to perform without significant deformation.
- Design Traffic - The equivalent number
of standard axles in one direction over the design period.
- Full Depth Asphalt Pavement - A pavement
consisting entirely of asphalt placed directly on the prepared subgrade.
- Pavement - The portion of the road which
is placed above the subgrade to support and form a running surface for vehicular
traffic.
- Shoulder - A portion of the road continuous
and flush with the pavement, and to be used for the standing of vehicles.
- Standard Axle - A single axle with dual
wheels loaded to a total mass of 8.2 tonnes.
- Sub-base - The portion of the pavement
between the base and the subgrade.
- Subgrade - The prepared formation on
which the pavement is constructed. (Fill or in-situ material).
- Surfacing or Wearing Surface - That portion
of the pavement in direct contact with vehicular traffic.
5.3 Introduction
Pavement design is the process of developing the most
economical combination of pavement layers, with respect to thickness and
type of material, to protect the soil foundation from the cumulative traffic
to be carried during the design life.
Although economics will always be a major factor
in the choice between rigid and flexible pavements, and between different
pavement designs, other factors will also influence the final design chosen.
For example:
- the expertise of the construction organisation,
- presence of public utility services, and
- drainage conditions.
5.4 Design Considerations
To prepare a pavement design the following information
must be obtained:
- the traffic to be carried;
- the design life of the pavement;
- the serviceability condition at the design life;
- the properties of the foundation soil;
- the pavement environment; and
- construction conditions.
5.5 Design Methods
There are two major approaches to flexible pavement
design:
- empirical methods, and
- theoretical methods.
Empirical methods are based mainly on evidence gained
from observation of existing roads e.g. observing what works and what doesn't.
The California Bearing Ratio Method of pavement design, for example, uses
a series of relationships between subgrade strength (CBR) and pavement thickness
derived by examining a large number of pavements that have been built in
the past. However the method has limitations when existing relationships have
to be used in environments with different materials, environmental conditions
or traffic loadings to those for which the relationships were developed.
Theoretical methods attempt to combine structural
theory (usually theory of elastic behaviour) with a knowledge of the behaviour
of road materials and foundation soils under repeated loading, to develop
a pavement thickness by analysis. The theoretical approach uses laboratory
and field testing to determine material properties which are then used in
the analysis process. The theoretical approach has limitations in the material
behaviour theories which must be used (e.g. analysis of any system other
than a multi-layered elastic structure is very difficult, and yet a multi-layered
elastic system does not mirror the real world), and the testing available
to determine material properties (e.g. for accurate analysis an elastic modulus
established under dynamic repeat loading with variable load amplitudes is
required, but such testing is extremely expensive). The design approach adopted
by the Department of Main Roads, Queensland, for pavements utilising a variety
of material types, is an example of a theoretical design method.
5.6 CBR Method of Pavement Design
5.6.1 CBR Test
The California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test was initially
developed by the California Highways Department to assess the quality of fine
crushed rock base material, by relating the load versus penetration curve
to that of a selected good quality fine crushed rock. Later, when the test
was used for assessment of subgrades this method of expressing the results
was continued. The standard fine crushed rock was allocated a CBR of 100.
The CBR of other materials is expressed as a percentage of this standard
material. Poor subgrade materials such as heavy clays are very weak compared
to the standard crushed rock and will therefore register CBRs in the area
of 1 to 5. Pavement materials used for base layers would be expected to have
strengths similar to crushed rock and the specification for base materials
will therefore require a minimum CBR of perhaps 60 or 80. It is possible
to obtain materials with CBRs higher than 100 and all this means is that
the materials are stronger than the original standard crushed rock.
The CBR value is determined by forcing a cylindical
plunger (50mm diameter) into a soil sample at the rate of 1 mm/min. The loads
required to cause 2.5 and 5.0 mm of penetration are recorded and expressed
as percentages of the loads to cause the same penetrations in the standard
crushed rock material (13.3 and 20 kN respectively).
Although it is possible to determine the CBR of
subgrade soils in-situ by jacking a plunger against a rigid frame (e.g. a
loaded truck), it is more normal for the test to be used to determine the
strength of remoulded material in a laboratory. If the soil is remoulded for
laboratory testing it is compacted into a cylindrical mould to provide a
sample 127 mm high and 152 mm in diameter. The sample may be soaked in water
for four (4) days before testing to determine the strength for a worse case
scenario (e.g. the road cover by floodwaters for 4 days).
5.6.2 CBR Pavement Design
The original CBR based design method was based on tests
made on a variety of existing crushed stone pavements judged to have reached
a critical structural condition. Two design curves were developed, one for
'light' traffic and one for 'heavy' traffic. The curves originally developed
by the UK Road Research Laboratory (RRL, now the TRRL) were modified for
Australian road conditions by Australian road authorities.
The CBR method of pavement design was developed
for multi-layer pavements of granular materials and should only be used for
such pavements having a thin bituminous seal coat surfacing.
5.7 Department of Main Roads (Qld.) Method of
Pavement Design
5.7.1 General
Details of the Department of Main Roads (Queensland)
method of pavement design are contained within their 'Pavement Design Manual'.
The Manual provides detailed guidelines for each of the principal phases of
the design process. Design charts are presented for a wide range of pavement
types.
5.7.2.Design Theory
The design method is based on elastic response of the
pavement to traffic stresses (i.e. each of the materials in the pavement structure
behaves in an elastic manner). The materials in the pavement are characterised
by parameters whose values are determined from field and laboratory testing.
The method assumes that failure will not occur as a result of permanent deformation
of granular or bound materials (and this assumption will be valid as long
as good construction procedures are followed, and the pavement is not subjected
to very high wheel loads such as can be caused by a very heavily overloaded
vehicle). The method also assumes that loss of pavement serviceability can
occur due to:
- fatigue of bitumen bound or cemented layers
due to repetitions of tensile strains at the bottom of such layers; and/or
- permanent deformation of the subgrade due
to repeated vertical compressive strains induced in the subgrade.
The critical locations for pavement failure are therefore
the bottom of bitumen bound or cemented layers (where tensile strains occur)
and the top of the subgrade (where compressive strains occur).
5.7.3. Design Period
The design period for a pavement depends on the type
of road, its location, and the intended usage during and after the design
period. Generally the more heavily trafficked the road the more difficult
it becomes to perform maintenance or reconstruction.
Typical design periods are as follows:
| Design Period (years) |
Type of Road and Location |
| 20 |
Rural roads other than freeways. |
| 25 |
Major urban roads and freeways. |
| 20 |
Minor urban roads. |
5.7.4. Design Traffic
The design traffic is expressed interms of the equivalent
number of standard axles (ESA) predicted during the design period. Design
traffic is dependent mainly on commercial vehicles with car traffic playing
only a very minor role in pavement life.
Calculation of design traffic involves calculating
a daily ESA value for the pavement based on current traffic conditions. This
value is then converted to a yearly value, and finally a design life value,
taking into account anticipated changes to the traffic volume over the design
life.
As an example, a road may have a current traffic
volume of 1000 vehicles per day, of which 5% are commercial vehicles, i.e.
50 commercial vehicles per day. Each commercial vehicle may be an average
of 1.2 ESA (the conversion figure being derived from extensive traffic surveys
based on the type of road). This means that the current traffic loading is
60 ESA. Over a whole year this would be approximately 22 000 ESA. If the
projected life for the pavement is 20 years and traffic doesn't grow in volume,
this equates to 22 000 x 20 = 440 000 ESA. However if traffic is growing
at 3% per annum, the figure increases to 620 000 ESA.
Design traffic figures will generally be in the
order of 100 000 to 5 000 000 ESA, although lower and higher design values
occur for lightly trafficked and very heavily trafficked roads respectively.
5.7.5 Subgrade Properties and Strength
As the pavement design method is based on layered elastic
theory it would be beneficial to use an elastic modulus for each pavement
material and the subgrade. However pavement materials and natural soils do
not behave in a perfectly elastic manner and the determination of elastic
moduli is difficult. For these reasons the subgrade strength is not specified
in terms of elastic modulus but in terms of the more readily determined CBR
value. As CBR is dependent on the nature of the soil, its density, and its
moisture content, it is important that the determination of CBR is made at
conditions under which the material is likely to perform in service.
5.7.6 Drainage
Pavement and subgrade moisture conditions exert a major
influence on the performance of roads. In pavement design it is important
to be able to recognise ways by which moisture may enter the pavement or subgrade
and to determine measures needed to control moisture movement.
Moisture changes usually result from one or more
of the following effects:
- seepage from higher ground near the road pavement;
- fluctuations in water table level;
- infiltration of water through the surface
of the road pavement and shoulders; and
- transfer of moisture in liquid or vapour states.
5.7.7 Determination of Alternative Designs
The Pavement Design Manual contains numerous design
charts. Each chart presents a unique solution for a particular design case
(traffic, pavement type, and subgrade CBR).
For example, Chart 38 is for a pavement structure
of 100 mm of asphalt, over cemented material category 1, over subgrade. The
chart has traffic loading (ESA) along the horizontal axis, and cemented layer
thickness along the vertical axis. On the chart are a series of diagonal lines
(curves), with each line representing a different subgrade CBR. The chart
is used by finding the known traffic loading (ESA) on the horizontal axis,
moving vertically upward from this point to the curve of the subgrade CBR,
then moving horizontally to the vertical axis to read off the required cemented
material thickness. This particular chart applies to only one asphalt type
in a particular climatic zone, and other climate zones require different
design charts.
5.7.8. Selection of Optimum Solution
The use of appropriate charts will give different design
solutions for the same problem. The optimum solution is that which satisfies
the design requirements at minimum cost while allowing for the following
additional constraints:
- Design considerations which cannot be readily
incorporated into the design charts (e.g. the need for boxed construction
in urban environments).
- The requirements of road users and future
maintenance problems.
- Availability of plant and materials.
Page last modified 25 June 2002.